Niet het klimaat wordt bedreigd, maar de vrijheid van de mens.
Those of who have long been in denial about the realities of global warming and the credibility of the IPCC, can now feel relieved, there may be hope for us yet. The diagnosis has been made; we have a psychological problem, which so far has failed to respond to the millions upon millions of dollars spent in communicating climate change to the masses.
However, the process of our redemption is already underway: A new publication called Communicating climate change to mass public audiences has just been presented to the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change, by the Climate Change Communication Advisory Group. ...
What is the Climate Change Communication Advisory Group This UK group is a project of the Public Interest Research Centre, an independent group who are partially financed by the UK governments Economic and Social Research Council. CCCAG is university based, with five psychology departments involved, including the US and also has WWF-UK as a member.
Communicating climate change to mass public audiences Working Document, September 2010
This short advisory paper collates a set of recommendations about how best to shape mass public communications aimed at increasing concern about climate change and motivating commensurate behavioural changes.
Its focus is not upon motivating small private-sphere behavioural changes on a piece-meal basis. Rather, it marshals evidence about how best to motivate the ambitious and systemic behavioural change that is necessary including, crucially, greater public engagement with the policy process (through, for example, lobbying decision-makers and elected representatives, or participating in demonstrations), as well as major lifestyle changes.
Essentially, it is a propaganda advisory document designed to help the government correct its populaces false consciousness. Dr Goebbels, Im sure, would have been full of admiration for sections like this:
Encourage public demonstrations of frustration at the limited pace of government action . Climate change communication could (and should) be used to encourage people to demonstrate (for example through public demonstrations) about how they would like structural barriers to behavioural/societal change to be removed.
Can this be for real? Here the government is being advised by one of its own think tanks how to railroad through its climate policies by encouraging mobs of activists to stage spontaneous protests demanding action which the majority of the electorate dont actually want. I know this sort of thing happens all the time in Pyongyang, Teheran and Caracas. But in Britain?