Prins Charles berispt klimaatsceptici

Geen categorie11 feb 2011, 16:30
In moderne monarchieën nemen de vorsten en hun entourage in het algemeen niet publiekelijk stelling in maatschappelijk vraagstukken die controversieel zijn. Zij worden geacht boven de partijen te staan. De britse kroonprins Charles heeft onlangs met die traditie gebroken. Volgens critici heeft hij daarmee reputatieschade opgelopen.
Onder de titel, 'Anger over Prince Charles's Climate Change Blast', in de 'Express' rapporteerde Richard Palmer daarover het volgende:

Prince Charles was accused of endangering his reputation yesterday after claiming climate change sceptics were “playing a reckless game of roulette” with the world’s future.

In a speech to Euro MPs and business leaders in Brussels, he lashed out at those urging caution in response to apocalyptic warnings about the effects of global warming.

The Prince suggested climate change sceptics were having a “corrosive effect” on public opinion by saying that hundreds of scientists around the world were somehow conspiring to present a false image of man-made global warming in an attempt to destroy the world economy.

Maar Benny Peiser van de Global Warming Policy Foundation, kwam snel met zijn commentaar:

But Dr Benny Peiser, director of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, a think-tank concerned about the costs of fashionable green policies, said: “He shouldn’t really take such a strong political position on such a contentious issue that divides public opinion, as polls show.

“I think he’s really risking his reputation. He’s not really helping the situation,” he said.

Charles haalde de bekende tranentrekker weer van stal – een populistisch argument dat in ons land ook door Diederik Samsom frekwent wordt gebruikt. Kunnen wij ons nageslacht nog wel recht in de ogen kijken als we nu niets doen aan die verschrikkelijke opwarming van de aarde (die maar niet wil komen)?

In his speech to the Low Carbon Prosperity Summit, Charles said of the sceptics: “I would ask how these people are going to face their grandchildren and admit to them that they actually failed their future; that they ignored all the clear warning signs by passing them off as merely part of a ‘cyclical process’ that had happened many times before and was beyond our control.”

“I wonder, will such people be held accountable at the end of the day for the absolute refusal to countenance a precautionary approach? For this plays, I would suggest, a most reckless game of roulette with the future inheritance of those who come after us.” ...

“I cannot see how we can possibly maintain the growth of GDP in the long term if we continue to consume our planet as voraciously as we are doing,” he added.

Maar Peiser was het daar niet mee eens.

Dr Peiser said the Prince was wrong on the key issue that the West’s economic model was flawed.

“More advanced societies in Europe and North America have a much better track record on environmental policies than other parts of the world,” he said.

“But also the prescriptons he is promoting, such as biofuels, are part of the problem and have been the cause of food riots around the world.”

Charles uses biofuels in his official cars and on the Royal Train, but the race to turn crops into green fuel has caused rainforests to be chopped down, and land formerly used to grow food in the Third World to be switched to its production.

Ook Andrew Montford, auteur van de 'Hockey Stick Illusion' deed een duit in het zakje.

Andrew Montford, author of The Hockey Stick Illusion, which seeks to debunk climate change science, said: “It isn’t sceptics who have eroded public opinion – climate scientists have destroyed their own credibility by hyping global warming and cheating the scientific process. More hype from Prince Charles will merely turn people off further.”

Laten we hopen dat hij gelijk heeft.
 
Lees verder hier.
 
Wie had ooit kunnen denken dat een Britse kroonprins zich nog eens als wegbereider van de ecosocialistische heilstaat zou opwerpen – een 'Brave New World'? Zou hij zijn kinderen en kleinkinderen daarover later nog wel recht in de ogen kunnen kijken?
 
Men kan zich afvragen of dit soort gedrag van zoonlief misschien de reden is dat de Britse vorstin nog maar liever een tijdje op de troon blijft zitten. Immers, een troonpretendent van over de 60 wekt toch wel enige verwondering.
 
Ondertussen blijft de 'energy poverty' in Groot Brittannië gestaag groeien. Zo luidt in Wales de alarmklok omdat mensen in de armste wijken geen geld meer hebben voor de verwarming van hun woningen.
 
Tja, de klimaatgekte maakt meer kapot dan je lief is.
Ga verder met lezen
Dit vind je misschien ook leuk
Laat mensen jouw mening weten