New Zealand climate scientists embroil themselves in as much of a climate data fraud scandal as Climategate and with eerily similar methods and results.
The New Zealand Climate Science Coalition (NZCSC) in its article NIWA Challenged to Show Why and How Temperature Records Were Adjusted (February 7, 2010) provides its readers with an insight into the climate scandal dubbed 'Kiwigate.'
NIWA is New Zealands National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research and is accused of repeatedly frustrating NZCSC in its attempts to get government climatologists to explain how they managed to create a warming trend for their nations climate that is not borne out by the actual temperature record.
According to NZCSC, climate scientists cooked the books by using the same alleged trick employed by British and American doomsaying scientists. This involves subtly imposing a warming bias during what is known as the homogenisation process that occurs when climate data needs to be adjusted.
On January 29, 2010, in what seemed like a reprise of the Phil Jones debacle at Britains Climate Research Unit, the Kiwi government finally owned up that 'NIWA does not hold copies of the original worksheets.'
Kiwigate appears to match Climategate in three essential characteristics. First, climate scientists declined to submit their data for independent analysis. Second, when backed into a corner the scientists claimed their adjustments had been lost. Third, the raw data itself proves no warming trend. Thus we may reasonably infer a 'carbon copy' of Climategate.